Checklist
Radiopharmaceutical Tech Transfer Checklist
A practical operational checklist for radiopharmaceutical technology transfer
Purist Inc.
Radiopharmaceutical
Tech Transfer Checklist
A manufacturing-focused operational checklist for radiopharmaceutical technology transfer, from facility assessment through process validation and commercial readiness.
Technology transfer in radiopharmaceutical manufacturing involves more than transferring a process from one site to another. Success depends on alignment across radiation infrastructure, regulatory approvals, quality systems, radionuclide supply, logistics, personnel qualification, and governance. Unlike conventional pharmaceutical manufacturing, radioactive decay, radionuclide licensing, and radiation safety requirements introduce additional operational constraints that can affect project timelines and readiness. This checklist is intended as a practical operational framework to support transfer planning, risk identification, and readiness assessments.
This checklist was developed based on publicly available regulatory guidance, industry practices, and observations from discussions across the radiopharmaceutical manufacturing, regulatory, quality, and supply chain ecosystem.
Important disclaimer. This checklist is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, medical, scientific, or professional advice. Applicable laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction and change over time, so consult qualified professionals before making compliance decisions. Purist Inc. and the author make no warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of this checklist and disclaim all liability for outcomes related to its use. Users are solely responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations in their jurisdiction.
Category key
Must be completed before the transfer can advance to the next stage.
Requires interaction with or submission to a pharmaceutical or radiation regulatory authority.
Manufacturing, equipment, logistics, and personnel readiness items.
Method transfer, testing, validation, and quality system items.
| Hot cell shielding specifications reviewed against the emission type and activity levels of the specific radionuclide being transferred Shielding adequacy is product-specific. Confirm against this product's actual radiation characteristics, not the facility's general use case. | Critical path | |
| Hot cell and isolator qualification status confirmed (DQ / IQ / OQ / PQ) per applicable sterile manufacturing requirements (FDA 21 CFR Part 211, USP <797> / <825>, or EU GMP Annex 1, as applicable by jurisdiction) and the receiving site's Validation Master Plan | Critical path | |
| Radioactive material license at receiving site confirmed to cover the specific radionuclide, chemical form, and activity levels of the transfer product If coverage is absent or insufficient, initiate amendment or new application immediately. License timelines frequently determine overall project timelines. | Critical path | |
| Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) appointed, qualified, and formally recognized by the relevant radiation regulatory authority | Regulatory | |
| Personnel dosimetry program in place: dosimeters assigned, monitoring schedule established, dose records system operational | Regulatory | |
| HVAC and differential pressure configuration verified as appropriate for radionuclide containment and GMP air quality classification | Operations | |
| Radioactive waste storage, decay-in-storage procedures, and disposal routes confirmed as compliant with applicable radiation safety regulations | Operations | |
| Contamination monitoring equipment installed and calibrated; personnel trained on survey and decontamination protocols | Operations | |
| Radionuclide production or supply source confirmed and qualified for the receiving site | Critical path | |
| Commercial-scale throughput capability assessed separately from clinical-scale qualification: hot cell capacity, synthesis module count, and batch frequency confirmed sufficient for projected commercial demand A site qualified for clinical-scale production is not automatically equipped for commercial volumes. This should be assessed explicitly and separately. | Critical path | |
| Synthesis module type, configuration, and software version at receiving site documented and formally compared against the sending site specification | Operations |
| Batch records include explicit time constraints relative to End of Bombardment (EOB) or End of Synthesis (EOS) for every critical process step Step timing must be documented as a process parameter, not a guideline. The decay clock governs every milestone. | Critical path | |
| Radiopharma-specific CPPs and CQAs documented: specific activity, radiolabeling yield, radiochemical purity, radionuclidic purity, and pH at time of release | Critical path | |
| Synthesis route parameters include target design specifications, bombardment conditions, and recovery chemistry where applicable | Operations | |
| Precursor and cold kit specifications, supplier qualifications, and approved vendor list transferred and reviewed at the receiving site | Operations | |
| Radionuclide specification formally transferred: acceptable radionuclidic impurity profile, activity concentration range, and qualified supplier documented Radionuclide source is a critical raw material. A process developed with one supplier source may behave differently when transferred to another. Supplier change controls must be defined. | Critical path | |
| Product shelf-life specification documented with decay-corrected activity limits at time of patient administration, not only at point of release | QC / Analytical | |
| Cleaning and decontamination procedures for synthesis module, hot cell, and ancillary equipment fully documented and transferred | Operations | |
| Environmental monitoring program adapted to the receiving site layout: sampling points, frequencies, and alert and action limits documented | Operations | |
| Manufacturing, QC, and batch record systems at the receiving site verified to support the transferred process | Operations | |
| All SOPs and batch record templates reviewed for completeness by both sending and receiving site quality teams before pilot phase commences | Critical path |
| Pharmaceutical regulatory filing requirements assessed: IND/CTA amendment, marketing authorization variation, or new submission, as applicable by jurisdiction | Regulatory | |
| Radiation regulatory requirements assessed: radioactive material license amendment, new license, or facility inspection, as applicable Initiate at Stage 1, not here. Radiation licensing timelines frequently exceed pharmaceutical filing timelines. | Critical path | |
| Regulatory lead designated with expertise in both pharmaceutical regulation and radiation regulatory compliance, or two leads with clearly defined interface responsibilities | Regulatory | |
| Regulatory timelines for pharmaceutical and radiation tracks mapped to the overall project plan with critical path dependencies identified | Regulatory | |
| CMC documentation updated to reflect receiving site: synthesis module, equipment, and process parameters, including radionuclidic data, dosimetry, and decay specifications in relevant CTD modules | Regulatory | |
| Pre-transfer regulatory communication prepared for pharmaceutical authority where process changes trigger reporting or prior-approval obligations | Regulatory | |
| Pharmaceutical and radiation inspection schedules coordinated; inspection readiness documentation prepared for both frameworks independently | Regulatory | |
| Authorized user (AU) and qualified person (QP) designations confirmed at receiving site per applicable jurisdictional requirements | Regulatory |
| Validation protocol designed for the decay-constrained environment: batch scheduling, decision windows, and acceptance criteria calibrated to the product's usable shelf life Conventional pharma validation timelines do not apply without explicit adaptation for radioactive decay constraints. | Critical path | |
| Engineering and non-GMP pilot batches planned to identify process differences between sites before GMP validation batches commence | Operations | |
| Equipment bridging studies defined where synthesis module type, configuration, or target design differs from the sending site. Equivalency must not be assumed. | Operations | |
| Full QC method transfer package completed: radiochemical purity (iTLC / HPLC), radionuclidic purity, specific activity, sterility, bacterial endotoxins, pH, and visual appearance | QC / Analytical | |
| Rapid release testing methods validated at the receiving site under the same time constraints as product shelf life. QC must execute within the release window, not be planned around it. | Critical path | |
| Reference standards for radiochemical and radionuclidic purity testing qualified at the receiving site | QC / Analytical | |
| Process performance qualification (PPQ) batches executed per validated protocol; all CQA acceptance criteria met across all required batches | Critical path | |
| Stability program initiated or bridged to existing data; real-time and accelerated stability samples placed at the receiving site under appropriate storage conditions | QC / Analytical | |
| Process validation report authored, reviewed, and approved by quality at both sending and receiving sites before commercial production begins | Critical path |
| Transport container validated for the specific radionuclide, activity levels, and expected transit duration Must comply with IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations (Class 7) and all applicable national transport regulations. | Critical path | |
| Shipping time studies conducted under realistic routing conditions; product confirmed to meet release specifications on arrival at the point of distribution | Operations | |
| Production schedule designed backward from required release and distribution timing, not forward from manufacturing convenience | Operations | |
| Backup logistics routing validated and documented; contingency procedures defined for flight delays, customs holds, or transport failures | Operations | |
| For theranostic programs: diagnostic and therapeutic supply processes validated and coordinated simultaneously. Both arms must be transfer-ready in parallel, not sequentially. | Critical path | |
| Import and export licenses and customs documentation assessed for each international distribution lane; pre-clearance arrangements established where possible | Regulatory |
| All manufacturing personnel trained and qualified in both GMP requirements and radiation safety protocols specific to the product being transferred | Critical path | |
| Radiochemists and nuclear pharmacists at the receiving site hold appropriate professional qualifications and, where required, specific regulatory authorizations | Regulatory | |
| Aseptic technique qualification completed for all personnel in sterile preparation steps, including aseptic process simulation (media fill) within the shielded environment | Operations | |
| Training records satisfy both GMP documentation requirements and radiation safety authority requirements. These are separate obligations and separate documentation systems. | Regulatory | |
| Cross-functional transfer team formally constituted with defined owners across CMC, quality, radiation safety, regulatory affairs, manufacturing, and logistics | Operations |
| Batch release procedure established: batch record review, QC results review, and qualified person or authorized release function formally designated at the receiving site | Critical path | |
| Continued process verification (CPV) program established: critical parameters trended across commercial batches, control charts maintained, review frequency defined | QC / Analytical | |
| Ongoing personnel radiation exposure monitoring reviewed against regulatory limits at defined intervals; escalation protocol in place for approaching or exceeding dose limits | Operations | |
| Post-transfer technical support period agreed with sending site: duration, scope, escalation contacts, and knowledge-sharing obligations formally documented | Operations | |
| Deviation, OOS, and CAPA procedures adapted for the radiopharma context: investigation timelines account for product decay; batch disposition decisions executable within the available window | QC / Analytical | |
| Annual product review (APR / PQR) process established at the receiving site for ongoing GMP compliance and continuous improvement | Operations | |
| Formal transfer acceptance criteria defined and documented: transfer is not considered complete until sign-off achieved at each governance gate, including validation acceptance and commercial readiness approval Transfer completion should be a documented decision, not an assumption. Governance gates should require explicit approval from quality, regulatory, and manufacturing leadership. | Critical path | |
| Technology transfer agreement and quality agreement executed between sending and receiving sites, defining roles, responsibilities, data ownership, and escalation pathways | Operations | |
| Change control procedure operational: post-transfer changes to synthesis module, precursor supplier, QC methods, or process parameters subject to formal impact assessment before implementation | Critical path |
Leila Safavi Purist Inc.
Radiopharmaceutical Tech Transfer Checklist Version 1.0 puristinc.com
Radiopharma CMC Tech Transfer